Apr. 23rd, 2010

logophile: (Difference Between Fiction and Reality)
[personal profile] logophile
A common thing I see everywhere where mainstream publishing happens (authors, agents, and editors among others) keep saying that self-publishing is great for non-fiction, but that fiction is a dead weight. As often as I've heard this, it just doesn't add up in the numbers I see from my fellow indie authors who are currently published in various places.

It seems to be that those mainstream people who write and publish fiction like to discourage those who would rather spend their time writing and publishing than sending query after query in the hopes of winning the book contract lotto. This isn't to say mainstream publishing is a bad choice, as I rather like many mainstream published books. However, it does make me question if the stigma of self-publishing was created more out of fear than a pure lack of quality.

Personally, I have a cover artist I pay well, two editors I use and pay for the privilege of using, and a layout designer to who sets up all my interior pages and my cover to send to my printer. I've done everything I can to ensure the product I produce and sell is as top quality as possible. I think that's the key. Self-publishers should take pride in their work and not think that self-publishing is a shortcut. It's not. It's taken me two years to get Rachmaninoff where it should be for release, and I don't regret a moment or dime spent. :)

What about the rest of you? Do you read self-published works? Are you self-published? Why did you choose to self-publish, if you have?


independentauthors: (Default)
Independent Authors and Publishers


Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios